The New Zealand Football (NZF) Integrity Framework is a guiding structure of Membership Protection and Regulatory measures to enhance and maintain positive experiences for all involved in Football in New Zealand.
It helps enable a reliable, timely, and consistent approach to any potential threats to the integrity of football in Aotearoa New Zealand.
A substructure of policies and procedures to support positive, safe, and inclusive environments in football.
Everyone involved in Football should be treated with respect and dignity and be free to participate without being discriminated against, harassed, bullied or abused. NZF recognise that it is the responsibility of every Member to safeguard the welfare and wellbeing of all participants involved in Football.
To understand more about NZF Safeguarding please see here.
Maintaining integrity is a collective responsibility and organisational culture starts from the top. As the controlling authority for Football in New Zealand, NZF champions all focus areas of the Integrity Framework and provides safeguarding and protective measures to all participants equally, including fit for purpose internal organisational policies and procedures for NZF staff.
A suite of regulations which uphold fair and honest competition in football.
Doping in Football is both unhealthy to the individual and contrary to the law and ethics of sport. NZF fully supports the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), the United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime (UNODC), and the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) against the use of banned substances and methods used to gain an unfair advantage.
Corruption which can include but is not limited to bribery, forgery and falsification has no place in Football in New Zealand and NZF has a duty to ensure the organisation and those within the Football environment are operating in a fair and transparent manner. Any form of corruption in Football has the potential to affect the integrity, growth and reputation of Football in New Zealand.
NZF is committed to maintaining the fundamental character of sporting competition as an honest test of skill and ability and to prevent match-fixing from undermining the integrity of the sport. Football in New Zealand could be a potential target of match-fixing and other illegal and unethical gambling activities. This infiltration damages the reputation of the sport and undermines its value.
On-Field Infringements
Governed by the NZF Disciplinary Code.
Managed by the relevant Competition Administrator or Federation Disciplinary, and Ethics Committee or NZF Disciplinary and Ethics Committee.
Off-Field Complaints
Governed by the NZF Code of Conduct and NZF Code of Ethics.
Has little or no connection to the field of play but connected to football.
Complaints can also be made directly with your Federation by visiting their website.
Both anonymous and named complaints are valid but there are certain distinctions between the two types of complaints. An anonymous complaint may limit the steps NZF can take with the information provided.
An anonymous complaint allows individuals to report concerns without fear of reprisal or retaliation, particularly in sensitive or high-stakes situations.
In the context of natural justice, anonymous complaints can raise issues of fairness and due process. In most instances, individuals who have been complained about have a right to know the specific allegations against them and have the opportunity to respond to them. With a named complaint, the respondent is always aware of the identity of their accuser, and they are given the opportunity to address the accusations. Named complaints may carry more weight as the credibility of the complainant can be assessed.
Parties to the proceedings may appeal a decision of the relevant Disciplinary and Ethics Committee, but only once and to the immediatley next higher body. The grounds for an appeal are:
Natural Justice: that natural justice was denied.
Power and Jurisdiction: that the decision make or decision making body acted outside of its powers and/or jurisdiction.
New Evidence: that substantial evidence became available after the decision which is being appealed was made.
Sanction or Penalty: that the sanction or penalty was excessive or inapproproate.
When lodging an appeal, please use the Notice of Appeal template located in the resources above.